PICKERINGTON CITY COUNCIL

TUESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2006

CITY HALL, 100 LOCKVILLE ROAD

 

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

7:30 P.M.

 

1.         ROLL CALL, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, AND INVOCATION. Council for the City of Pickerington met for a regular session Tuesday, October 3, 2006, at City Hall.  Mayor Shaver called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.  Roll call was taken as follows:  Mr. Fix, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Smith, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Sabatino, Mrs. Riggs, and Mayor Shaver were present. No members were absent.  Others present were: Judy Gilleland, Lynda Yartin, Linda Fersch, Phil Hartmann, Chief Mike Taylor, Rick Palsgrove, Sean Casey, Alan Davis, Tony Barletta, Gary Weltlich, David Owen, and others. 

 

2.         A.        APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF September 19, 2006, PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING REZONING OF 4.22 ACRES.  Mr. Sabatino moved to approve; Mr. Smith seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sabatino, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Smith, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Fix, and Mrs. Riggs voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

B.         APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF September 19, 2006, COUNCIL WORK SESSION.  Mrs. Riggs moved to approve; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Smith, Mr. Fix, Mr. Hackworth, Mrs. Hammond, Mrs. Riggs, and Mr. Wisniewski voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

C.        APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF September 19, 2006, REGULAR MEETING.  Mr. Smith moved to approve; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Hackworth, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Smith, Mr. Fix, Mrs. Riggs, and Mr. Sabatino voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

3.         APPROVAL OF AGENDA.  Mr. Fix moved to approve; Mr. Smith seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Fix, Mr. Smith, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Wisniewski, and Mrs. Riggs voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

4.         COMMUNITY COMMENTS:   There were no Community Comments. 

 

5.         APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA:  Mayor Shaver stated there were no Consent Agenda items this evening.

 

6.         COMMITTEE REPORTS:   

 

            A.        FINANCECOMMITTEE (Mr. Wisniewski).  Mr. Wisniewski stated Finance Committee met on September 21st and there are three items on the agenda tonight from that meeting.  He stated Ordinance 2006-100 is for the new health insurance for the City’s employees and he would ask for three readings this evening so it will be in place by the end of the year. 

 

7.         REPORTS:

 

A.        MAYOR.  Mayor Shaver stated the Monthly Mayor’s Court Report had been distributed and he would answer any questions.   

 

B.         LAW DIRECTOR.  Mr. Hartmann stated Items 8.G through J are second readings on settlements on Diley Road.  He stated we anticipate a great deal more of these coming in the very near future. 

 

C.        FINANCE DIRECTOR.  Mrs. Fersch stated as Mr. Wisniewski had indicated she had three items on tonight’s agenda.  She stated she would request three readings on the appropriation ordinance as it does have some income tax refunds in it, and as Mr. Wisniewski had indicated she would also ask for three readings on the health insurance ordinance.  Mrs. Fersch stated Resolution 2006-18R authorized the total amount of transfers and was being done at the recommendation of the Auditors.  She stated this is something that we already do, it was just a housekeeping item the Auditors recommend we have on the books. 

 

D.        SERVICE MANAGER.  Ms Gilleland stated there was no report from the Service Manager. 

 

E.         MANAGER.  Ms Gilleland stated her report had been distributed, and she would be happy to answer any questions.    She stated budget season is underway and she anticipated presenting a draft of the 2007 Budget to Finance Committee at their October 19th meeting.  Ms Gilleland stated we are still aiming to have the right-of-way cleared by the end of the year so the utilities can begin the process of relocating.   

 

8          PROCEDURAL READINGS:

 

            A.        ORDINANCE 2006-73, “AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AN ANNEXATION OF 316 ACRES IN VIOLET TOWNSHIP, FAIRFIELD COUNTY, TO THE CITY OF PICKERINGTON, STATE OF OHIO,” First Reading, Hackworth.  (TABLED, 08/01/06)

 

            B.         ORDINANCE 2006-99, “AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2006 APPROPRIATION, ORDINANCE 2005-98,” First Reading, Wisniewski.  Mr. Wisniewski moved to adopt; Mr. Smith seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Riggs, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Smith, Mr. Hackworth, and Mr. Fix voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0.  Mr. Wisniewski moved to suspend the rules for the purpose of three readings; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Smith, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Fix, Mr. Wisniewski, and Mrs. Riggs voting “Yea.”  Suspension of Rules passed, 7-0.  Second Reading.  Mr. Wisniewski moved to adopt; Mr. Hackworth seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Fix, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Smith, and Mrs. Hammond voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0.  Third Reading.  Mr. Wisniewski moved to adopt; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Sabatino, Mrs. Hammond, Mrs. Riggs, and Mr. Fix voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

            C.        ORDINANCE 2006-100, “AN ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A ONE-YEAR CONTRACT WITH MEDICAL MUTUAL OF OHIO FOR HEALTH INSURANCE FOR CITY EMPLOYEES,” First Reading, Wisniewski.  Mr. Wisniewski moved to adopt; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Mr. Wisniewski stated this is a new health plan the City is entering into as we are removing ourselves from the Central Ohio Health Care Consortium that we have been a part of for the past several years.  He stated this plan will provide considerable savings to the City and to the employees with nearly the same coverage we currently have.  Mr. Wisniewski stated as this plan must be in place by 1 January 2007, he would ask for three readings this evening.  Roll call was taken with Mrs. Hammond, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Fix, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Hackworth, and Mr. Smith voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0.  Mr. Wisniewski moved to suspend the rules for the purpose of three readings; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Smith, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Fix, and Mrs. Hammond voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0.  Second Reading.  Mr. Wisniewski moved to adopt; Mr. Smith seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Smith, Mr. Fix, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Sabatino, and Mr. Hackworth voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0.  Third Reading.  Mr. Wisniewski moved to adopt; Mr. Smith seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Fix, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Riggs, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Sabatino, and Mr. Smith voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

            D.        RESOLUTION 2006-18R, “A RESOLUTION OF ITEMS APPROPRIATED IN 2006 BUDGET AND AUTHORIZING TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSFERS TO NOT EXCEED AMOUNTS APPROVED, INCLUDING ANY FUTURE AMENDMENTS DURING THE 2006 BUDGET YEAR,” First Reading, Smith.  Mr. Smith moved to adopt; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Mr. Smith stated Mrs. Fersch had briefed on this item in her report and is a housekeeping item recommended by the Auditors.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Fix, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Hammond, Mrs. Riggs, and Mr. Hackworth voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

            E.         ORDINANCE 2006-92, “AN ORDINANCE REZONING 4.22 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF S.R. 256 JUST SOUTH OF THE PICKERINGTON HEALTH CENTER, FROM C-3 (COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL) TO P-0 (PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT) AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PICKERINGTON ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY,” Second Reading, Hackworth.

Mr. Hackworth moved to adopt; Mrs. Hammond seconded the motion.  Mr. Hackworth stated this is a very good development for the City.  Roll call was taken with Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Smith, Mr. Fix, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Sabatino, and Mr. Hackworth voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

            F.         ORDINANCE 2006-93, “AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A MODIFICATION OF THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH MALCOLM PIRNIE FOR ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF SERVICES AND FUNDING REQUEST, Second Reading, Riggs.  Mrs. Riggs moved to adopt; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Mrs. Riggs stated this was additional work to evaluate our options for the wastewater treatment plant expansion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Smith, Mr. Fix, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Sabatino, and Mr. Hackworth voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

            G.        ORDINANCE 2006-95, "AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE APPROPRIATION OF A 0.018 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT, FROM LISA Y. HARPER, WEST OF DILEY ROAD, CITY OF PICKERINGTON, COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD, STATE OF OHIO, Second Reading, Hammond.  Mrs. Hammond moved to adopt; Mr. Hackworth seconded the motion.  Mrs. Hammond stated this is part of the Diley Road acquisition.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Fix, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Smith, and Mrs. Hammond voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

            H.        ORDINANCE 2006-96,  "AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE APPROPRIATION OF A 0.02 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT, FROM PATRICK L. SEAMAN AND PENNY L. SEAMAN, WEST OF DILEY ROAD, CITY OF PICKERINGTON, COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD, STATE OF OHIO, Second Reading, Hammond.  Mrs. Hammond moved to adopt; Mr. Hackworth seconded the motion.  Mrs. Hammond stated this is part of the Diley Road acquisition.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Fix, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Smith, and Mrs. Hammond voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

            I.          ORDINANCE 2006-97,  "AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE APPROPRIATION OF A 0.02 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT, FROM ALPHONSO GUICE, JR. AND MARLA K. GUICE, WEST OF DILEY ROAD, CITY OF PICKERINGTON, COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD, STATE OF OHIO, Second Reading, Hammond.  Mrs. Hammond moved to adopt; Mr. Hackworth seconded the motion.  Mrs. Hammond stated this is part of the Diley Road acquisition.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Fix, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Smith, and Mrs. Hammond voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

            J.          ORDINANCE 2006-98,  "AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE APPROPRIATION OF A 0.02 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT, FROM EDDIE JACKSON AND CHARLENE JACKSON, WEST OF DILEY ROAD, CITY OF PICKERINGTON, COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD, STATE OF OHIO, Second Reading, Hammond.  Mrs. Hammond moved to adopt; Mr. Hackworth seconded the motion.  Mrs. Hammond stated this is part of the Diley Road acquisition.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Fix, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Smith, and Mrs. Hammond voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

            K.        RESOLUTION 2006-15R, "A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO APPROPRIATE A 0.319 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, FEE SIMPLE INTEREST, AND A 0.251 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, FROM ANGELA M. MCDOWELL, LOCATED EAST OF DILEY ROAD, CITY OF PICKERINGTON, COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD, STATE OF OHIO, Second Reading, Hackworth.  Mr. Hackworth moved to adopt; Mrs. Hammond seconded the motion.  Mr. Hackworth stated this is the intent to appropriate property for the Diley Road project.  Roll call was taken with Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Smith, Mr. Fix, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Sabatino, and Mr. Hackworth voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

            L.         RESOLUTION 2006-16R, "A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO APPROPRIATE A 0.144 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, FEE SIMPLE INTEREST, AND A 0.027 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, FROM RYSARD REJMISZ AND ELZBIETA T. REJMISZ, LOCATED WEST OF DILEY ROAD, CITY OF PICKERINGTON, COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD, STATE OF OHIO, Second Reading, Hackworth.  Mr. Hackworth moved to adopt; Mrs. Hammond seconded the motion.  Mr. Hackworth stated this is also dealing with the Diley Road project.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Smith, Mr. Fix, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Sabatino, and Mr. Hackworth voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

            M.        RESOLUTION 2006-17R, "A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO APPROPRIATE A 0.069 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, FEE SIMPLE INTEREST, AND A 0.058 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, FROM 436 DILEY ROAD, LLC, LOCATED EAST OF DILEY ROAD, CITY OF PICKERINGTON, COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD, STATE OF OHIO, Second Reading, Hackworth.  Mr. Hackworth moved to adopt; Mrs. Hammond seconded the motion.  Mr. Hackworth stated this is another Diley Road acquisition.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Smith, Mr. Fix, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Sabatino, and Mr. Hackworth voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

9.         LEGISLATIVE READINGS:

 

            A.        ORDINANCE 2006-87, “AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PROHIBITION ON PERSONS WHO HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF AND/OR WHO HAVE BEEN CLASSIFIED AS EITHER A SEXUAL PREDATOR OR AS A SEXUALLY ORIENTED OFFENDER FROM ESTABLISHING A RESIDENCE OR OCCUPYING RESIDENTIAL PREMISES WITHIN ONE THOUSAND (1,000) FEET OF ANY SCHOOL PREMISES, LICENSED DAYCARE FACILITIES, CITY-OWNED OR OPERATED PUBLIC PARKS, SWIMMING POOLS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC, OR PUBLIC OR COMMUNITY PLAYGROUNDS,” Third Reading, Smith.  Mr. Smith moved to adopt; Mrs. Riggs seconded the motion.  Mr. Smith stated this is the final reading on this ordinance and he would be happy to answer any questions.  Roll call was taken with Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Fix, Mr. Smith, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Hackworth, and Mr. Sabatino voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

            B.         ORDINANCE 2006-91 (AS AMENDED), “AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 1050 AND 1060 OF THE CITY OF PICKERINGTON CODIFIED ORDINANCES ESTABLISHING WATER AND SEWER RATES,” Third Reading, Hackworth.  Mr. Hackworth moved to adopt; Mrs. Riggs seconded the motion.  Mr. Hackworth stated this was the legislation to raise the water and sewer rates to help make our two utilities solvent.  Mr. Smith stated he had read an article recently that the City of Columbus will be raising their sewer rates as well.  Mr. Sabatino stated the article Mr. Smith is referring to dealt with correcting some findings from the EPA in their sewer system.  Mr. Smith stated that was correct.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sabatino voting “Nay,” and Mr. Fix, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Riggs, Mrs. Hammond, and Mr. Smith voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 6-1. 

 

10.       OTHER BUSINESS:  Mr. Fix stated Finance Committee met and had its initial debate on the proposed economic development agreement between the Township and the City.  He stated that debate lasted for several hours and at the end of that meeting Mr. Wisniewski scheduled a Special Finance Committee meeting for September 25th.  He stated, however, Mr. Wisniewski and Mr. Hackworth were unable to attend that meeting and without a quorum there was no meeting.  Mr. Fix stated at that point he requested Mr. Wisniewski schedule another Special Finance Committee meeting to continue the debate and to allow for a vote on the legislation so it may move forward to Council for further debate and eventual vote.  He stated unfortunately they have not been able to schedule such a meeting and it is his belief that no such meeting will happen between now and the next regularly scheduled Finance Committee meeting on October 19th.  Mr. Fix stated Mr. Smith will be unable to attend that Finance meeting and will not have an opportunity to vote, and that means at worst, the legislation will not be brought before Council but will be voted down, and at best, it will be moved back to the November Finance meeting which will push back any hope of moving this legislation forward and have it completed before St. Patrick’s Day of next year.  Mr. Fix stated he believed it was imperative that this be moved forward quickly and that Council have the opportunity to have full, open debate over the course of three meetings so the public can be involved and the press would be present.  Mr. Fix stated he also believed that time was of the essence and in reviewing the City’s Code he felt that Service Committee would be the more appropriate place for this legislation to be reviewed as Service Committee deals with land use.  He stated for these reasons, he would request the Mayor move this legislation to the Service Committee for their review at their next meeting.  Mayor Shaver inquired if it was his prerogative to select committees and Mr. Hartmann stated he has reviewed the Code in-depth on this issue, and he could not find anything to support either way how something gets to Committee.  He stated it was his understanding that customarily in the past this is what has been done.  Mr. Hartmann stated further there is nothing that prohibits it from being in two committees, but it must be passed out of one committee prior to a final vote.  Mr. Wisniewski stated Finance has a meeting scheduled for October 5th, and Mr. Fix stated that is a work session, not a special meeting where anything can be voted on.  Mr. Wisniewski stated it appeared Mr. Fix’s only intent is to move it out of committee and not to discuss it.  Mr. Fix stated his intent was to move it out before all of Council so all of Council can discuss it and the public can comment on it.  Mr. Sabatino stated he had received an e-mail from Mr. Fix that stated this legislation was done, or something to that effect, and he wanted to move forward with it.  Mr. Sabatino stated that meant, to him, that he has already made up his mind on it and that is the way it going to be; not that it is open for more discussion and changing it as it moves forward.  Mr. Fix stated he has asked that it be put before Council for vigorous, honest, open debate before the public and before the press.  Mr. Fix stated Finance Committee members had the opportunity to attend a Special Finance Committee meeting, and they chose not to, and they chose not to call a Special Finance Meeting where it could be voted on, and it was held back from Council.  He stated he thought that was wrong and he was asking this be moved forward to Council for debate.  Mr. Sabatino stated he had read in the newspaper where Township Trustee Dunlap had stated there wasn’t any urgency in this matter.  Mr. Sabatino further stated he felt any urgency Mr. Fix was expressing was self-imposed on his part, and he felt it was wrong to shop for a committee where there was a more favorable chance of getting something through the way you want it to go.  He continued we have a process we should be using and he didn’t see the need to circumvent the process like Mr. Fix was requesting.  Mr. Sabatino stated council members can offer input in a work session just as they can in a council meeting, and he thought everyone knew once it hit council floor discussion would be minimal at best before someone called the question.  Mr. Fix stated he disagreed and he has committed not to call the question, and asked everyone else not to call the question, because if it took three or four hours of discussion each time, then that is what they should do.  Mr. Fix stated he did not feel the public shows up for special meetings, and Mr. Sabatino stated he felt they had and they would again.  Mayor Shaver stated he had no preference on what Committee this went through, however, we do not have a specific procedure of determining what goes through what Committee, it has always been pretty much the sponsor or staff to select what committee items go through.  Mayor Shaver stated if Mr. Fix wanted to move this to Service Committee he had no objections to doing that.  Mr. Sabatino stated he felt that completely circumvented the ways things are intended to be and if he wanted it in Service Committee he should have put it there from the very beginning, not move it there now that he has hit a road block.  Mr. Fix stated Mr. Wisniewski put it on the Finance Committee agenda, and Mr. Wisniewski stated Mr. Fix had agreed that was the place for it because it was an “economic” development agreement.  Mayor Shaver stated perhaps we could let this stay on the Finance Committee agenda and also put it on the next Council agenda.  Mr. Hartmann stated it can be put on the Council agenda as long as the committee action occurs prior to the third reading.  Mr. Hackworth stated he would like to have some assurance that they can at least make amendments to the currently proposed agreement, and Mayor Shaver stated amendments can always be made if the majority of council concurs.  Mr. Wisniewski stated it should be worked out in committee first, where it belongs.  He stated Finance has had one discussion on this issue, they have a work session scheduled for October 5th to work on it again, and also the next regular Finance meeting on October 19th.  He stated he did not see why this was being forced through.  Mayor Shaver stated he is willing to defer to the Councilman who is the sponsor and move it to Service Committee if they do not want to follow the compromise suggestion of keeping it in Finance and putting it on the next Council agenda.  Mr. Fix stated Mr. Smith will not be able to attend the Finance meeting on October 19th, so he would ask that it be moved to Service Committee where it can get a vote and be moved to Council.  Mayor Shaver asked Mr. Hartmann if there was anything that would prohibit moving this from one committee to another and Mr. Hartmann stated Section 220.04(G) of the Code states “all ordinances and resolutions shall be referred to an appropriate committee for review and recommendation prior to final action by Council.”  Mr. Hartmann stated he did not see anything in the code that either permitted or prohibited something being moved.  Mr. Fix stated he believed it was in the best interest of the community that this be moved to council where discussion can be held.  He stated he would ask again that this be moved to Service Committee so it can be voted on.  Mayor Shaver stated he would move it to Service Committee, and if something were found showing that was not proper he would be glad to withdraw this action.  Mr. Sabatino stated if he found something that did not allow it he would do what he had to to make sure it never happened again.  Mr. Wisniewski stated the Finance Work Session scheduled for October 5th was, therefore, cancelled and asked Mrs. Yartin to make the proper notification.   

 

11.       MOTIONS:  There were no motions. 


12.       ADJOURNMENT.  There being nothing further, Mr. Fix moved to adjourn; Mr. Smith seconded the motion.  Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Fix, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Sabatino, and Mrs. Hammond voted “Aye.”  Motion carried, 7-0.  The meeting adjourned at 8:25 P.M., October 3, 2006.

 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: 

 

 

__________________________________

Lynda D. Yartin, Municipal Clerk

 

ATTEST:

 

 

__________________________________

David Shaver, Mayor