PICKERINGTON CITY COUNCIL

TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2007

CITY HALL, 100 LOCKVILLE ROAD

 

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA

7:30 P.M.

 

1.         ROLL CALL, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, AND INVOCATION. Council for the City of Pickerington met for a regular session Tuesday, May 1, 2007, at City Hall.  Mayor Shaver called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.  Roll call was taken as follows:  Mr. Fix, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Smith, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Sabatino, Mrs. Riggs, and Mayor Shaver were present.  No members were absent.  Others present were: Chief Taylor, Lynda Yartin, Chris Schornack, Phil Hartmann, Ed Drobina, Rex Myer, Sean Casey, Rick Palsgrove, Pastor Riggs, Gary Weltlich, David Owen, Carol Carter, Bruce Englehardt, Jim Woods, and others.  Pastor Riggs of Peace United Methodist Church delivered the invocation. 

 

2.         APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2007, REGULAR MEETING.  Mr. Smith moved to approve; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sabatino, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Smith, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Fix, and Mrs. Riggs voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

3.         APPROVAL OF AGENDA.  Mr. Smith moved to approve; Mrs. Riggs seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Smith, Mr. Fix, Mr. Hackworth, Mrs. Hammond, Mrs. Riggs, and Mr. Wisniewski voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

4.         COMMUNITY COMMENTS:  There were no community comments.    

 

5.         APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA:  Mayor Shaver stated there were no consent agenda items this evening. 

 

6.         COMMITTEE REPORTS:   

 

A.        SERVICE COMMITTEE.  Mrs. Hammond stated one item on tonight’s agenda came out of the last Service Committee and Mr. Drobina would address that.  She stated she would be happy to answer any questions. 

 

B.         FINANCE COMMITTEE.  Mr. Smith stated Finance met on April 19th, and several items on tonight’s agenda came out of that meeting.  He stated Mr. Schornack will address those items.  Mr. Smith stated Finance had scheduled a work session for earlier this evening and it was cancelled due to the emergency in Ms Gilleland’s family.  He stated that work session was being rescheduled for June 5, 2007, at 6:00 P.M.  Mr. Smith stated he would be happy to answer any questions.   

 

7.         REPORTS:

 

A.        MAYOR.  Mayor Shaver stated the Monthly Mayors Court Report had been distributed and he would answer any questions.  Mayor Shaver stated Ms Gilleland’s father passed away and that is why she is not here this evening. 

 

B.         LAW DIRECTOR.  Mr. Hartmann stated he had nothing to report at this time but would answer any questions. 

 

C.        FINANCE DIRECTOR.  Mr. Schornack stated Mrs. Fersch was requesting three readings on the appropriations, Ordinance 2007-22, as there are some items included that need to be taken care of.  He further stated Mrs. Fersch wanted to emphasize that Ordinance 2007-23, was not to exceed $800,000, so when it is time to borrow it could be up to this amount, but it could be less. 

 

D.        SERVICE MANAGER.  Mr. Drobina stated Ordinance 2007-21, authorizes an agreement with The Shelly Company for our annual street improvement/repaving project.   

 

E.         MANAGER.  No report.  

 

8.         PROCEDURAL READINGS:

 

            A.        ORDINANCE 2006-73, “AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AN ANNEXATION OF 316 ACRES IN VIOLET TOWNSHIP, FAIRFIELD COUNTY, TO THE CITY OF PICKERINGTON, STATE OF OHIO,” First Reading, Hackworth.  (TABLED, 08/01/06)

 

            B.         ORDINANCE 2007-21, “AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE SHELLY COMPANY FOR PICKERINGTON’S 2007 ANNUAL STREET IMPROVEMENT/REPAVING PROJECT,” First Reading, Fix.  Mr. Fix moved to adopt; Mr. Smith seconded the motion.  Mr. Fix stated as Mr. Drobina noted, we opened bids for our street paving project and The Shelly Company had the best bid.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Fix, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Hammond, Mrs. Riggs, and Mr. Hackworth voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

            C.        ORDINANCE 2007-22, “AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2007 APPROPRIATION, ORDINANCE 2006-164,” First Reading, Smith.  Mr. Smith moved to adopt; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Mr. Smith stated most of the items on this ordinance are related to contracting out fleet maintenance.  He stated the ordinance also contains an appropriation of $5,000 for a donation to the Violet Township Bicentennial event.  Mr. Smith stated this is a matching donation to what the Violet Township Trustees approved at their last meeting.  Mr. Smith stated he would request three readings this evening.  Roll call was taken with Mrs. Hammond, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Fix, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Hackworth, and Mr. Smith voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0.  Mr. Smith moved to suspend the rules for the purpose of three readings; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Smith, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Fix, and Mrs. Hammond voting “Yea.”  Suspension of Rules passed, 7-0.  Second Reading.  Mr. Smith moved to adopt; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Smith, Mr. Fix, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Sabatino, and Mr. Hackworth voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0.  Third Reading.  Mr. Smith moved to adopt; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Fix, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Riggs, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Sabatino, and Mr. Smith voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

            D.        ORDINANCE 2007-23, “AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF NOT TO EXCEED $800,000 OF NOTES BY THE CITY OF PICKERINGTON, OHIO, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING PART OF THE COSTS OF ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SERVICES FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY’S SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT,” First Reading, Hammond.  Mrs. Hammond moved to adopt; Mr. Smith seconded the motion.  Mrs. Hammond stated this ordinance will authorize the borrowing up to $800,000 for the engineering costs.  She stated we are hoping that the contract will be less than that, but we need to be prepared and start the proceedings.  Mr. Sabatino stated he did not believe we have yet decided on an engineering firm as yet and Mrs. Hammond stated that was correct.  Mr. Sabatino stated because of that fact he did not see any hurry to borrow money until we at least have a contract in place.  Mr. Wisniewski stated we need to have the funding in place so when the contract is solidified we can go out for bid immediately.  Mr. Hackworth stated we do have some time constraints and we need to get all the parts of the process moving.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sabatino voting “Nay,” and Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Riggs, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Smith, Mr. Hackworth, and Mr. Fix voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 6-1. 

 

            E.         ORDINANCE 2007-24, “AN ORDINANCE GRANTING AN EXEMPTION TO THE APPLICABILITY OF THE IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE TO EQUITY, INC., FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE TOBIN, MERRIT, INC., PROJECT BASED ON THE DETERMINATION OF THE PICKERINGTON CITY COUNCIL THAT THE PROJECT WILL CREATE AN EXTRAORDINANRY ECONOMIC IMPACT AND/OR EMPLOYMENT GROWTH,” First Reading, Smith.  Mr. Smith moved to adopt; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Mr. Smith stated Mr. Hansley is a strong supporter of this ordinance and feels this business can have a payroll in excess of $1,000,000 per annum and is the type of business the exemption criteria was written for.  Mr. Smith stated we will recoup in income tax the cost of this exemption in three years or less.  Mayor Shaver stated he would just advise Council to use caution in these matters.  He stated when you begin to exempt businesses you begin to run down a slippery slope because the next business that comes in will want to know why they do not qualify.  Further, businesses who have paid the impact fee will want to know why they did not get this same benefit.  Mayor Shaver stated he did not believe these two businesses were the type we anticipated for the exemption; he believed we anticipated a very large scale employer.  He stated he meant no disrespect to these businesses, but he was just very cautious in granting these exemptions.  Mr. Smith stated this was the subject of a great deal of discussion at Finance Committee and also Finance Committee is reviewing the requests of two other businesses to reimburse impact fees.  Mr. Smith stated the Committee requested Mr. Hansley provide them with some criteria, which he did, so we have some fairly well defined criteria that we can use.  He stated Finance was concerned because we would be setting the bar and we did not want the bar to be set so low that the impact fees for commercial would be meaningless.  Mr. Smith stated Finance Committee felt, on the two businesses before Council tonight, that the General Fund will be made whole within a three year period.  Mayor Shaver stated these are not free, we are not simply waiving a tax, we have to make it up from our own General Fund.  Mr. Sabatino stated when we were working on the impact fees he distinctly remembered asking what the term “extraordinary” meant and at that point in time Mayor Shaver did not make any comment as to size or whatever.  Mr. Sabatino stated his interpretation of “extraordinary” meant something that would have an accelerated cash flow of funds to the City.  Mayor Shaver stated he was not questioning the wisdom of Council he was just cautioning them against opening the floodgates.  Mrs. Riggs stated she felt it would be helpful to her in making this decision if she could see the criteria Mr. Smith had referred to.  Mr. Smith stated Mr. Hansley’s report was in the last Finance Committee packet, and Mrs. Yartin will e-mail the criteria to all of Council.  Mr. Wisniewski clarified that Tobin Merrit is currently an employer in the City and without moving to larger offices they were going to locate outside the City, so not only would it be a loss but it would be compounded because we would lose not only what we currently have, but future revenue.  Mrs. Riggs stated she agreed that it was important to keep the businesses that we have, but at the same time we should be cautious.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Hackworth voting “Nay,” and Mr. Sabatino, Mr. Fix, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Hammond, and Mrs. Riggs voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 6-1. 

 

            F.         ORDINANCE 2007-25, “AN ORDINANCE GRANTING AN EXEMPTION TO THE APPLICABILITY OF THE IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE TO BERRY & MILLER, INC., FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE VOLUNTEER ENERGY SERVICES, INC., PROJECT BASED ON THE DETERMINATION OF THE PICKERINGTON CITY COUNCIL THAT THE PROJECT WILL CREATE AN EXTRAORDINANRY ECONOMIC IMPACT AND/OR EMPLOYMENT GROWTH,” First Reading, Fix.  Mr. Fix moved to adopt; Mr. Smith seconded the motion.  Mr. Fix stated he agreed with the Mayor that we would be opening Pandora’s Box for impact fee waivers to businesses, however, he would like to reassure everyone that we were opening the lid on that box very carefully.  Mr. Fix stated Finance Committee has spent many hours with two other applicants discussing how we can do this in a way that does not make it so every business that comes to Pickerington gets a waiver.  He stated in Mr. Hansley’s analysis, the criteria is that there is a pay back period and also that it reflects on the impact made on the community by the business.  Mr. Fix stated retail and residential have a significant impact on the cost of community services from this community and that offices and light industrial have a lower impact.  Mr. Fix stated Mr. Hansley also pointed out that our community has a very limited amount of incentives that we can provide to potential employers.  He stated in the case of Volunteer Energy Services, they are currently not in Pickerington and they had two choices to make; locate their business in Michigan where they have another branch or to locate here in Central Ohio, preferably in Pickerington because the owner of the company and several employees live here.  He stated based on that, and based on the fact that the pay back for the waiver of the impact fees is less than a year and that the income stream from this business will be quite long lasting and quite profitable for the City, he felt comfortable moving it forward to Council.  Mr. Fix stated he understood Mayor Shaver’s concern and agreed with it, but Finance is working very hard to make sure we do this in a very smart way and a very fair way.  Mr. Hackworth stated he understood that if the business does not attain the employment goals or the income they would have to pay the impact fee, however, he did not see that in the ordinance.  Mr. Fix stated Mr. Hansley did a calculation on the current employment of the business and their current payroll, and based on that made the assessment that this would be a good thing to move forward.  Mr. Wisniewski stated there is nothing in the ordinance that is a failsafe mechanism for the City.   Mr. Hackworth stated when he spoke to Mr. Hansley he indicated he would set something up like that and questioned if there was another document outside this ordinance.  Mr. Smith stated there is something like that on two other requests that are before Finance, but not in this case.  Mr. Hackworth stated further the ordinance does not set forth the amount of the impact fee that would be waived.  Mr. Sabatino stated true to what was represented when the impact fee ordinance was being created, this has been handled on a case-by-case basis on the merits of each and every situation.  Mr. Wisniewski stated Mayor Shaver’s comments are not without merit because we have two before us now and there are two more before Finance.  He stated we need to make sure the thresholds are in place and the rules are fairly hard and fast so we don’t start down that slippery slope.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Hackworth voting “Nay,” and Mrs. Hammond, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Fix, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Sabatino, and Mr. Smith voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 6-1. 

 

            G.        ORDINANCE 2007-26, “AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 2006-163 ENTITLED ‘AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A MASTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH VIOLET TOWNSHIP REGARDING ANNEXATION AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT’,” First Reading, Fix.  Mr. Fix moved to adopt; Mr. Smith seconded the motion.  Mr. Fix stated earlier this year Council adopted the ordinance authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Master Economic Development Agreement with the Township.  He stated after the ordinance was passed, the Township came back with some changes to the document.  He stated further we have subsequently been invited to join the group that includes Violet Township, Bloom Township, Canal Winchester, and the City of Lancaster, in a memorandum of understanding for commercial development along the Route 33 corridor.  He stated with both of those facts, the ordinance that had the agreement in it was no longer valid and should therefore be rescinded.  Mr. Sabatino stated he felt everyone knew what the original ordinance dealt with; there was a referendum on it and an initiative petition.  Mr. Sabatino stated he suspected the timing of the introduction of this legislation at this time and he saw no sense of urgency to bring it forward at this time.  He stated if we had more than enough people sign a petition to vote on this issue he felt we should respect their wishes.  Mrs. Riggs stated they would be voting on something that is no longer valid and she did not see waiting until closer to November.  Mr. Sabatino stated he was under the impression this had the concurrence of the Township and obviously it didn’t, so he questioned why this was coming forward now.  He stated if it was that important why wasn’t it brought forward a couple of months ago when we knew the Township wasn’t moving forward with it.  Mrs. Riggs stated knowing how government works she did not see that this was an unreasonable timeframe.  Mr. Fix stated this was not put on tonight’s agenda for any political reason.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Wisniewski and Mr. Hackworth abstaining, Mr. Sabatino voting “Nay,” and Mrs. Riggs, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Smith, and Mr. Fix voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 4-1. 

 

            H.        ORDINANCE 2007-20, “AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 852 OF THE PICKERINGTON CODIFIED ORDINANCES REGULATING PEDDLERS AND SOLICITORS,” Second Reading, Mrs. Riggs.  Mrs. Riggs moved to adopt; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Smith, Mr. Fix, Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Wisniewski, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Sabatino, and Mr. Hackworth voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0.  

 

9.         LEGISLATIVE READINGS:

 

            A.        ORDINANCE 2007-16, “AN ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH MORTON SALT FOR SOFTENING SALT FOR THE CITY’S WATER TREATMENT PLANT,” Third Reading, Fix.  Mr. Fix moved to adopt; Mr. Hackworth seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Fix, Mr. Smith, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Hackworth, and Mr. Sabatino voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

            B          ORDINANCE 2007-18, “AN ORDINANCE VACATING 0.341 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OF OLD DILEY ROAD, LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF S.R. 256, CITY OF PICKERINGTON, COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD, STATE OF OHIO,” Third Reading, Hackworth.  Mr. Hackworth moved to adopt; Mrs. Hammond seconded the motion.  Mr. Hackworth stated this part of Old Diley Road that connects to S.R. 256, and we are going to abandon it and give it back to the two adjacent property owners.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Sabatino, Mrs. Hammond, Mrs. Riggs, and Mr. Fix voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0.  

 

            C.        ORDINANCE 2007-19, “AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1048 OF THE CITY OF PICKERINGTON CODIFIED ORDINANCES ESTABLISHING CAPACITY CHARGES FOR WATER SYSTEM FOR LARGE CONNECTIONS,” Third Reading, Hackworth.  Mr. Hackworth moved to adopt; Mrs. Hammond seconded the motion.  Mr. Hackworth stated this will establish our fees for a 10-inch fire line.  Mr. Hackworth clarified that Mr. Drobina has checked the calculations and the amounts contained in the ordinance are correct.  Roll call was taken with Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Fix, Mr. Smith, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Hackworth, and Mr. Sabatino voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

10.       OTHER BUSINESS:  Mr. Fix stated in April the Mayor requested he and Mr. Wisniewski to come up with a fact-based presentation that could be provided to the citizens in an effort to inform them on Issue 9.  He stated he had provided Council with two versions of what he and Mr. Wisniewski came up with.  He stated one version is called “unedited” which included some of Mr. Wisniewski’s opinions.  He stated the second is called “edited” and he had edited that himself to include simply facts.  Mr. Fix moved to authorize the City Manager to immediately publish the edited version of this document to all the citizens of the City of Pickerington and that it go out in the mail no later than this Friday; Mrs. Riggs seconded the motion.  Mayor Shaver clarified that Mr. Wisniewski and Mr. Fix have not had a chance to meeting and discuss the edited version.  Mayor Shaver stated he would request a recess to allow Mr. Wisniewski and Mr. Fix meet with Mr. Hartmann to see if they can reach an agreement on either version.  Mr. Sabatino stated he did not receive copies of either version until he got to the meeting this evening and he did not feel he has had enough time to read it let alone understand what it meant.  Mr. Fix stated it was just put together at a late hour this afternoon. 

 

Mr. Fix moved to recess briefly; Mr. Smith seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sabatino abstaining, and Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Fix, Mr. Smith, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Wisniewski, and Mrs. Riggs voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 6-0. 

 

(Council recessed at 8:15 P.M. and reconvened in open session at 8:55 P.M.)

 

Mr. Fix stated in conferring with Mr. Hartmann he and Mr. Wisniewski did come to an agreement on what should be published to City residents.  He stated in fairness to all Council members they were requesting a Special Council Meeting be scheduled for Thursday, May 3, 2007, to allow all members the opportunity to review the document.  Mr. Fix moved to schedule a Special Council Meeting for Thursday, May 3, 2007, at 7:30 P.M.; Mrs. Riggs seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Fix, Mr. Smith, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Sabatino, and Mr. Wisniewski voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

Mr. Sabatino stated during the recess he had distributed to all of Council a copy of an excerpt of the Council meeting held on March 20, 2007.  He stated in those minutes it shows that Mr. Wisniewski clarified the Mayor would like this to be strictly a motion of Council, not something that would be paid for and distributed by the citizens, but a motion that would be made at a future Council meeting.  He stated it appeared we are now proposing to do something that is outside the scope of that.  Mayor Shaver stated he is taking no position on this whatsoever.  Mr. Wisniewski stated at this point no agreement has been reached, they have only agreed on some rough points and it still needs a motion from Council floor on what action will be taken.  He further stated a lot of things need to be figured out between now and the Special Meeting and to say that we are going to spend taxpayer dollars to send something out, he didn’t know.  He stated Thursday will be the deciding vote.  Mr. Sabatino stated then no decision has been made.  Mr. Fix stated there is a motion on the floor, and he would table the motion and it would be brought up again on Thursday.  Mr. Sabatino requested the Clerk to read back the motion.  Mrs. Yartin stated the motion is to authorize the City Manager to immediately publish the edited version of this document to all the citizens of the City of Pickerington and that it go out in the mail no later than this Friday.  Mr. Fix moved to Table the motion; Mrs. Riggs seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Fix, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Sabatino, and Mrs. Hammond voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0.  (TABLED)

 

11.       MOTIONS: 

 

            A.        MOTION REQUESTING THE LAW DIRECTOR TO INVESTIGATE THE DISCLOSURE OF ANY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE MEMORANDA TO THE PUBLIC RELATING TO THE CHARTER BALLOT INITIATIVE. Mr. Sabatino moved to request the law director to investigate the disclosure of any attorney-client privilege memoranda to the public relating to the Charter ballot initiative; Mr. Wisniewski seconded the motion.   Mr. Smith moved for Executive Session under Section 121.22G(1(g), Matters involving investigation of complaints against an employee or official; Mr. Wisniewski seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken on the motion for Executive Session with Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Fix, Mr. Smith, Mr. Hackworth, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Sabatino, and Mr. Wisniewski voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

Council adjourned to Executive Session at 9:00 P.M. and reconvened in open session at 9:40 P.M.

 

Mr. Sabatino moved to amend his previous motion to request a motion to authorize the law director to prepare a general memorandum regarding remedies for breaching the attorney-client privilege and an educational memo regarding the responsibilities of attorney-client privilege; Mr. Hackworth seconded the motion to amend.  Roll call was taken on the motion to amend with Mr. Sabatino, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Smith, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Fix, and Mrs. Riggs voting “Yea.”  Motion to amend passed, 7-0.  Roll call was taken on the motion as amended with Mr. Sabatino, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Smith, Mr. Fix, Mr. Wisniewski, and Mrs. Riggs voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 7-0. 

 

12.       ADJOURNMENT.  There being nothing further, Mr. Smith moved to adjourn; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Mrs. Riggs, Mr. Fix, Mr. Hackworth, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Sabatino, and Mrs. Hammond voted “Aye.”  Motion carried, 7-0.  The meeting adjourned at 8:18 P.M., April 17, 2007. 

 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: 

 

 

_______________________________

Lynda D. Yartin, Municipal Clerk

 

 

ATTEST:

 

 

 

_______________________________

David Shaver, Mayor