PARKS & RECREATION BOARD
CITY HALL, 100 LOCKVILLE ROAD
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2009
REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL. Mr. Pawlowski called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm. Present were Ms. Adams, Ms. Green, Mr. Boetcher, and Mr. Pawlowski. Absent were Ms. Sanders and Ms. Hammond. Also present were Parks and Recreation Director Steve Carr and Recreation Coordinator Don Ross.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM JANUARY 26 REGULAR MEETING.
This was preceded by a point of order. Decisions by the board require four votes for confirmation. Since Mr. Boetcher had missed the January meeting, it was thought that he would have to abstain from approving the January minutes, thus leaving the resultant voting one member short. Mr. Pawlowski moved to defer acceptance of the January minutes until the March meeting. Seconded by Ms. Green.
Mr. Boetcher, aye; Ms. Green,
aye; Mr. Pawlowski, aye; Ms. Adams, aye. The motion passed 4-0.
3. COMMUNITY COMMENTS. Mr. Pawlowski reported that he had heard positive
comments about Parks staffer Wayne Patterson from youth in the community. Mr Carr
replied that he would pass that on to Mr. Patterson. Mr. Pawlowski informed that he
had received questions about the swimming pool fees for 2009. Mr. Carr explained that
fees would stay the same, except their would be a lower price for singles passes for
youth under 18.
Mr. Pawlowski added that he had gotten some feedback from parents at the new
playground area in Victory Park.. Mostly they were concerned about mud on the new
surface, and by the single access to the area. They understand, however, that corrective
landscaping cannot occur until spring.
Ms. Sanders arrived at 7:10 pm.
4. REPORTS
A. Parks and Recreation Director’s Report
1. Mr. Carr explained that the city and the Parks Department will not apply for a
Nature Works grant this year. Violet Township will apply for the grant to fund
their new dog park, and the city does not want to compete with them for the grant
award. Mr. Pawlowski praised that decision. Ms. Sanders inquired about the
effectiveness of the registration process for winter programs, since a brochure was
not used. Mr. Carr noted that registration numbers were down, but the influences
could be the economy; the miserable weather; or perhaps the use of the new
process, which presented the course offerings on the city website. That system
was utilized as a budget measure. He explained that the brochures cost $24,000
annually, and that a new procedure beginning with the spring season would be a
newspaper insert costing only $10,000. Ms. Sanders related that Mayor O’Brien is
promoting List Serve as a way to communicate with the public, and that system
would have application for Parks business.
Ms. Adams suggested that a strategy is needed to get people to the website, and to
inform them of their resident or non-resident status. She also questioned whether
enough appropriate programs are being offered, and whether tracking systems
have indicated park usage. Mr. Carr replied that programs can be tracked by
computer, but not park usage. Ms. Sanders asked whether a survey would be
helpful. Mr. Boetcher replied that a survey was done several years ago to coincide
with a Revised Master Plan.
Ms. Adams repeated that there is confusion about citizen status related to
geographical locations of neighborhoods. Mr. Boetcher said that proof of that
occurred with swimming pool issues during the summer of 2008. Ms. Green
offered that a Joint Park District would solve many of the problems being
discussed. A brief discussion related to the Joint Park District creation ensued.
B. Council Representative’s Report. Ms. Green advised that, on the Council level, no new discussion on a Joint Park District possibility had occurred so far this year.
5.
BOARD DISCUSSION ITEMS
A.
REVIEW AND
DISCUSSION REGARDING SCHEDULING WORK
SESSION. Mr. Carr explained that if the Board wants
to schedule a work session, it has to be advertised, and it must be open to the
public. Also his understanding of the new Administrative Code is that the Board
is mandated to advise council through the Safety Committee. If further
guidelines are needed, a joint meeting with the Safety Committee is one option.
Ms. Adams questioned the history of the Board in promoting or realizing projects
and goals. Mr. Carr cited several recent successes which stemmed from Parks
Board action: the skate park, the disc golf course, the revamped leash law,
shelter house rental rates, and regulations governing field usage. Ms. Sanders
said that a joint meeting with the Safety Committee or ideas from that body
prior to a work session or retreat could stimulate future directions for the
Board.
6.
OTHER BUSINESS. Mr. Pawlowski asked the Board to consider
ways to show
support for the township dog park.
Mr. Carr suggested an official letter of
support, which could be given to the
grant writer.
7.
ADJOURNMENT.
Ms. Green moved to adjourn. Seconded by Ms. Adams.
Mr. Pawlowski, aye; Ms. Adams, aye; Mr.
Boetcher, aye; Ms. Sanders, aye;
Ms.
Green, aye. The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 pm.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY
_____________________________________
Donald R. Ross, Recreation Coordinator
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Stephen A. Carr, Director