RULES COMMITTEE OF COUNCIL
CITY
HALL, 100 LOCKVILLE ROAD
WEDNESDAY,
MAY 5, 2010
REGULAR
MEETING
8:00
P.M.
1. ROLL
CALL. Mr. Fix called the meeting to
order at 8:00 P.M., with roll call as follows: Mr. Fix, Mr. Wisniewski, and Mr.
Blair were present. No members were
absent. Others present were Mayor
O’Brien, Lynda Yartin, Trisha Sanders, Tony Barletta, Brian
Sauer, Cristie Hammond, and
others.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF March 3, 2010, Regular Meeting. Mr. Wisniewski moved to approve; Mr. Fix
seconded the motion. Roll call was
taken with Mr. Blair, Mr. Fix, and Mr. Wisniewski voting “Yea.” Motion passed, 3-0.
3. SCHEDULED MATTERS:
A. Discussion regarding establishing
criteria for naming purposes. Mr. Fix
stated the Committee has been reviewing this and now in addition to the naming
of a park. a street, etc., there is the issue of considering the selling of
naming rights as a part of this legislation.
He stated the law director had provided a memo on this issue that the
Committee members received this evening.
Mr. Wisniewski stated he felt the language in subparagraph b) under
Naming Rights Restrictions should read “promote alcohol and other addictive
substances” and not include the remaining language. The Committee members concurred with Mr.
Wisniewski. Mr. Wisniewski stated
further that he felt sub paragraphs b) and c) could then be combined.
Mr. Wisniewski stated he
questioned if there was a way to restrict this based on the name of the
proposed sponsor, and Mrs. Hammond stated she concurred and she could not
support something like “Sam’s Tattoo Parlor.”
Mr. Fix stated as he read it, ultimately City Council
had final approval on this process and had the right to reject proposals. Mr. Sauer questioned if this should be
something handled administratively by the City Manager as it would take time to
go through the legislative process. Mr.
Wisniewski stated it would still have to go through Council
to accept the donation and Mr. Fix stated he felt the final approval should
remain with City Council. Mrs. Hammond stated she felt this policy
seemed to cover all of the questions that were raised in Safety Committee. Mr. Fix stated he would then request the law
director prepare legislation that combined this policy, with the changes just
recommended, and the draft ordinance on a policy for the renaming/honorary
designation of streets and a policy for the naming/renaming of parks and city
facilities that was provided to the Committee for review at the June 2nd
Rules Committee meeting. All Committee
members concurred.
4. CHAIRMAN:
A. Review
and discussion regarding potential changes to the Administrative Code. Mr. Fix stated this includes cleaning up some
things that Council changed anticipating an
expedited Charter review process that did not occur. Mr. Fix stated he had provided a proposed
restructuring of committees as a result of our strategic plan and a strong
recommendation from the group that took us through the strategic plan that we
align our committees with that plan. He
stated he had broken up projects according to the seven core areas of focus and
then looked at the personnel that currently report to various committees of
council and who it would make sense for them to report to under a restructured
committee program. He stated he had
looked at what we currently do and put that into the seven committees. Mr. Fix stated he understood that seven
committees were a lot and it has already been suggested that recreation is
covered by our Parks and Recreation Board and we could continue with our
current representation there and limit the number of council committees to
six. Mrs. Sanders questioned if the
suggested Infrastructure, Planning and Development would be P&Z and Mr. Fix
stated that would be Service. Mr.
Wisniewski questioned if the committees were outlined in the Charter and Mr.
Fix stated he had checked with the law director and the committee structure is
in the Administrative Code, not the Charter.
Mr. Fix stated
to summarize, Administration and Operations was basically Rules Committee with
a little more, Communication and Collaboration and Economic Development would
be new committees, Financial Planning and Management is Finance,
Infrastructure, Planning and Development is Service, Police – Safety is Safety
and a little less, and Recreation and Community Involvement would be handled by
Parks and Recreation. Mr. Sauer stated
in looking at this he felt that Administration and Communication could be
combined and Safety and Recreation could be combined. Mr. Wisniewski stated he did not even know
why there would have to be a communications committee that is Council driven
versus staff. Mayor O’Brien stated this
appeared to be a tremendous amount of micromanagement of staff. He stated all the economic development is handled
by staff and questioned why there would be Council oversight of their daily
work. Mr. Fix stated this came out of
the strategic plan and Mayor O’Brien stated we did not have an Economic
Development Director at that time. Mr.
Fix stated one item identified in the strategic plan was to hire an Economic
Development Director and we have done that.
He stated although we have a Chief of Police we still have a Safety
Committee, we have a Director of Finance and we still have a Finance
Committee. He stated he did not know why
Council would not want an Economic Development Committee because that is one of
the most important things we are doing.
Mrs. Sanders stated since this can be changed by the Code, she
questioned if it would benefit us to just form the Economic Development
Committee right now, and then the Code could be revised later to include
others. Mr. Fix stated he would think
that every two or three years when we revise the strategic plan this would be
revised because there might be committees we no longer need or committees that
need to be added. He stated the projects
he has identified in his memo will come and go; projects can be deleted or
added at any time. He stated the process
he is discussing tonight is to determine what committees we want to have going
forward. Mr. Sauer stated with the
Economic Development Committee he did not see that as an intent to micromanage
as much as it is in the spirit of our Charter to give direction from Council
on which way we want to proceed. He
stated in looking at the items listed, Council should have the ability to
provide direction. He further stated he
felt this was more about direction, what direction did Council
want to push with this and without any type of oversight or Council
involvement you would have a hard time providing that direction to the City
Manager. Mr. Wisniewski stated it seemed
to him that this was being broken out to minute detail and it could easily be
handled with the current committees. He
stated we could rename them or whatever or restructure to a certain extent, but
he did not see the need to break out Economic Development into another section
and pretend that there is the skill set on Council
that exceeds that of our Economic Development Director or to give them
direction on what we think we want them to do.
Mr. Wisniewski stated he would definitely rather see our new City
Manager’s input on any restructuring or possible restructuring after he gets
here and understands where we are and understands the direction of Council. Mr. Fix stated that could be nine months from
now and Mr. Wisniewski stated we do not have to have a restructuring in order
to do everything in this memorandum. Mr.
Wisniewski stated he could not say that changing the names of committees and
restructuring things around would make any difference. He stated further our new
City Manager has more experience than any of Council
in city administration and staff administration, and he should have some input
into the process. Mayor O’Brien stated
in the interim couldn’t economic development, communication, etc., be added as
expanded agenda items on existing committees and begin the process of coming up
with a management process or oversight without actually establishing new
committees yet. Mayor O’Brien stated one
of his concerns would be what changes the Charter Review Board would be
recommending. He stated whatever the
Charter Review Board recommends will be voted on at the ballot and that would
give Council an indication for planning. Mrs. Hammond stated in looking at the
individual bullet points she felt we could move ahead as much as we want, but
we do not have the money to implement much of it. Mr. Sauer stated as he understood it, Mr. Fix
was just looking for a way to match the committees with what came out of the
strategic plan meeting and to find a way to keep Council
informed on what is going on with the goals that were set. Mr. Fix stated that was correct, and in a
conversation with our consultant he stated that every time a strategic plan has
been successfully implemented it is when a Council
has restructured their committees to be in line with the strategic goals. Further, any time it has not been successful
it has been because Council tries to jam it
into the current structure. Mr. Fix
stated he could understand combining administration and communication, and he
could understand keeping parks as it is right now, so we are down to having one
new committee which would be economic development. Mr. Fix stated he felt there were very valid
reasons to put together a committee that would deal specifically with that and
offer direction, help, or whatever Council could. He stated if after six months there was
nothing going on there, so be it, we could change it again because this is not
set in stone. Mr. Fix stated he felt it
made sense to add that committee and then ask the chairs of the four committees
that would be there to accept the responsibility for these projects that came
out of our strategic plan. He stated then
with our new City Manager coming on
board in July, perhaps next fall we could have another strategic planning
session; revise our strategic plan and go into 2011 knowing what would be in
the Charter, knowing what would be in the new strategic plan with the City
Manager’s input, and refresh this. He
stated he did not feel we should wait until the end of the year when all we are
really talking about is adding an Economic Development Committee. Mrs. Sanders stated she agreed with Mr.
Wisniewski in that since we have waited this long maybe we should wait for the new
City Manager, but, at the same time, shame on Council
for waiting this long. Mrs. Hammond
stated she would question if having a committee with Council and the Economic
Development Director would do any good instead of having the Economic
Development Council. Mr. Wisniewski stated that was his thought,
having a committee of professionals that are business oriented and would have a
vested interest would accomplish more.
He stated he would rather see representatives from small businesses and
larger businesses sit on a committee versus elected officials who weren’t
professionals. Mr. Blair stated economic
development is on Service Committee and he did not see what would be
accomplished by creating a separate committee.
Mr. Fix stated it would break it out so there is an emphasis on economic
development, including the creation of an Economic Development Council. Mr. Wisniewski stated we hired an Economic
Development Director and she has only been on board a little over a month so
she has not had the opportunity to come back with anything. He stated he would rather engage her in this
and have her let Council understand what she needs from them to accomplish the
goals they assign to her. Mr. Wisniewski
stated we have the professional staff, we have the plan, and Council can assign
projects to her in Service or whatever committee she reports to. Mrs. Hammond stated Council could also
schedule a work session to let the Economic Development Director know what
Council is looking at because she may not know what Council
is looking for. Mrs. Sanders stated we
do not want to sit and wait for development to come to us. Mayor O’Brien stated at no point in time when
this position was filled before was there a Council committee to oversee this position. Mr. Fix stated it was not to oversee the
position, and Mr. Wisniewski stated he felt it would be to oversee the Economic
Development Director and Planning and Zoning.
Mr. Fix stated it would be to work on the economic development of our
community. Mr. Wisniewski stated this
started out with a need for seven committees based on how our strategic plan
is, and now we are down to five so why couldn’t it be combined into our current
structure. Mr. Sauer stated he felt
economic development was the second most important thing the city is facing
right now with safety being the first.
Mayor O’Brien stated he questioned if anyone would consider revenue a
top priority because without revenue there is nothing else. He stated he was not trying to diminish the
importance of economic development, but he did not feel it was the most
important thing we were doing. He stated
we need to look at revenue. Mr. Fix
stated he had listed under Finance as one of the top four projects to identify
potential sources of sustainable funding.
Mr. Fix stated he just did not understand why there was such resistance
to adding more participation and more emphasis to economic development. Mr. Blair stated everything identified under
economic development could be done in Service and he has no problem with the
way we are going now. Mr. Wisniewski
stated again we just hired the Economic Development Director and the new City
Manager will be coming on board, so why don’t we let these two key people get
in place and then Council can talk to them about how they want to see things
occur. He stated if they want to have an
Economic Development Council, then we could do that. Mrs. Hammond stated the problem with the
goals that were reached at the strategic planning session is that every one of
them requires money to implement. She
stated until we determine the way to increase revenue we can’t do any of
them. Mrs. Sanders stated she felt after
that session that we had a plan, and any successful business has a plan, and
you start working on it. She stated she
did not agree that we couldn’t do any of it because while some of the goals
would take a lot of money, some of them could be done. Mr. Blair stated he just did not know what
creating another committee would accomplish.
Mr. Barletta stated he thought an Economic Development Committee might
sharpen council’s focus. Mr. Barletta
stated our current committees have somewhat of an overlap. He stated as an example if Mr. Bachman
reports to Service and then says the same thing again at Safety, then we are
not being efficient with his time. Mr.
Wisniewski stated he understood Mr. Barletta was saying he would like to
restructure what we have, and Mr. Barletta stated he would like to see that and
then make the agendas agree with the salient points we want to address in the
strategic plan and he did not know that you had to restructure the number of
committees to accomplish that. Mr. Sauer
stated he would like to see us focus on what we came out with at the strategic
planning session, and he knew when the City Manager gets on board that should
speed things along, but he would like to see us focus on economic
development. Mr. Barletta stated he
agreed having the City Manager on board would help and he agreed that economic
development is certainly something that is very important to the future of the
city. Mr. Wisniewski stated he agreed
with restructuring what we have. Mayor
O’Brien stated he felt Mr. Fix had done a great job of expanding out everything
we know needs to be addressed and perhaps everyone just needs to think about it
and come back with a counter proposal.
Mr. Fix stated he would request this be continued on the agenda for the
next committee. Mr. Wisniewski stated he
would request the economic development portion of the Service Committee agenda
be expanded to include some of these issues.
Mr. Fix stated part of what he saw in this would be conversations on
things such as what is our policy on annexation; how do we want to work with or
against the Township; how do we want to work with the Township on the JEDD; how
do we want to co-market? All of those
are questions that if he were the Economic Development Director he would want
some direction on to understand what Council wanted on these different
things. Mr. Fix stated he appreciated
everyone’s comments and he would ask everyone to look at it and the discussion
could be continued at the next meeting.
5. OTHER BUSINESS: Mrs. Yartin stated she would like to discuss
a volunteer appointment to the Tree Commission.
She stated Mr. Brian Neill had been appointed to the Tree Commission in
August of last year, however, he has failed to attend any meetings and this has
caused meetings to be cancelled due to the lack of a quorum. She further stated staff has tried to contact
him by phone, voice mail, and by letter but he has not responded to any of
these attempts. Our current legislation
states that three consecutive unexcused absences is cause for removal from the
Commission. Mr. Wisniewski stated he
felt we should replace him on the Commission and determined that when Mr. Neill
was interviewed other candidates were interviewed as well. Mr. Fix requested a brief recess so the
Committee could review the applications of the individuals who had been
interviewed by Rules Committee.
Rules
Committee recessed at 9:00 P.M. and reconvened in open session at 9:05 P.M.
Mr. Fix moved that Brian Neill’s
appointment to the Tree Commission be rescinded and that Michael Vega be
appointed to that unexpired term; Mr. Wisniewski seconded the motion. Roll call was taken with Mr. Fix, Mr.
Wisniewski, and Mr. Blair voting “Yea.” Motion passed, 3-0.
6. ADJOURNMENT. There being nothing further, Mr. Fix moved
to adjourn; Mr. Blair seconded the motion.
Mr. Fix, Mr. Blair, and Mr. Wisniewski voted "Aye." Motion carried, 3-0. The Rules Committee adjourned at 9:07 P.M,
May 5, 2010.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
________________________________
Lynda D. Yartin, Municipal
Clerk