SERVICE COMMITTEE OF COUNCIL

CITY HALL, 100 LOCKVILLE ROAD

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2010

 

REGULAR MEETING

6:30 P.M.

 

1.         ROLL CALL.  Mr. Fix called the meeting to order at 6:30 P.M., with Mr. Fix and Mr. Sauer present.  Mr. Wisniewski was absent due to a work commitment.  Others present were:  Bill Vance, Lynda Yartin, Ed Drobina, Greg Bachman, Susan Crotty, Tony Barletta, Gavin Blair, Tricia Sanders, Seth Dorman, Alexa Liebert, and others.

 

2.         APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF August 18, 2010, Regular Meeting.  Mr. Sauer moved to approve; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sauer and Mr. Fix voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 2-0. 

 

3.         COMMUNITY COMMENTS:  There were no community comments. 

 

4.         DEVELOPMENT:

 

A.        Development Director’s Report.  Ms Crotty stated she had provided a written report and she would be glad to answer any questions. 

 

            (1)        Annexation – Update.  Ms Crotty stated we are still waiting on the survey to be corrected so it can be refilled and we have communicated with the petitioner that the research has been completed.  Ms Crotty stated we will not be including Busey Road in the annexation so the maintenance of that will remain as is.  Mr. Fix inquired if not annexing Busey Road had any impact and Ms Crotty stated Mr. Vance had spoken to the Township to make sure they were informed by us that this would be the case.  She stated the Township has an arrangement with Canal Winchester about maintenance and that will continue.  Mr. Vance stated this was being communicated to Mr. Yaple and no objections have been received. 

 

            (2)        Development Process – Update.  Ms Crotty stated she had no update this evening. 

 

            (3)        Economic Development Marketing Plan – Update.  Ms Crotty stated she has received some feedback on brand and she is working through that with our consultant.  She stated she had also provided a copy of the report from the Board of Consultants of the Columbus Board of Realtors showing feedback from their tour of Diley Road.  Ms Crotty stated we are following through on those recommendations and we have already put up the directional sign to U.S. 33.  Mr. Fix stated for the record he would like to thank Councilman Blair for bringing the Board of Realtors to the City and they were very helpful. 

 

            (4)        Business Retention Project – Update.  Ms Crotty stated she had nothing further to report this evening. 

 

            (5)        Long Range Economic Development Plan – Update.  There was no further update.

 

            (6)        Implementation of the Diley Road Corridor Plan – Update.  Ms Crotty stated she had no update this evening.   

 

B.         Review and request for motion to approve draft resolution to amend the Community Reinvestment Area (CRA).  Ms Crotty stated she had not received the draft legislation for tonight’s meeting, but she did anticipate having that completed to move forward in the near future.  She stated she plans to proceed as discussed to include the Eichhorn and the Skilken properties.  Mr. Fix stated if Mr. Sauer had no objections he would like to move this issue forward to Council contingent on getting the legislation out as soon as possible so it can be acted upon quickly.  Mr. Sauer stated he concurred with that action.  Mr. Fix moved to forward legislation on the Community Reinvestment Area to Council contingent upon it meeting all of the requirements of staff and review by Council; Mr. Sauer seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Fix and Mr. Sauer voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 2-0. 

 

Mr. Vance stated this legislation provides a lot to interpretation unfortunately and he felt we need to solidify the City’s position and also work with our bond counsel to make sure the language is as friendly as possible when we send it to Columbus.  He stated that is what we are working on and he apologized for the delay but some information came to our attention in the recent past regarding some grey areas and we are just working through those.

 

5.         PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT:

 

A.        Planning and Zoning Director’s Report. Ms Crotty stated Mr. Schultz is ill this evening, but she would answer any questions. 

 

                        (1)        Planning and Zoning Representative Report (Mr. Sauer)  Mr. Sauer stated he had no report. 

 

Mr. Vance stated the Chamber was kind enough to work with staff as a clearing house for sign regulation comments and it is his understanding the deadline is approaching to receive those comments and they should be coming to the City’s staff in the near future.  Mr. Vance stated those comments will be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission in October and have a report to Council as well. 

 

            B.         ACTION ITEMS:  

 

                        (1)        Review and request for motion to approve draft ordinance for rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan for the approximate 5.05 acre Skilken property from C-3 (Community Commercial) to PC-3 (Planned Community Commercial District) for the Windmiller Medical Campus located just south of Kroger’s on Old Diley Road and to schedule a public hearing for Tuesday, October 19, 2010, at 7:10 P.M.  Ms Crotty stated the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval as a Final Development Plan with 13 conditions.  She stated the developer was agreeable with the conditions and this will help them move forward with the development of the medical office complex south of Kroger.  She stated she would answer any questions and Mr. Seth Dorman from Skilken is present as well.  Mr. Dorman stated he would like to thank Mr. Vance, Ms Crotty, and the rest of the City staff for taking the time to meet with them on a number of occasions and for helping Sheppard the application through the process.  He stated he would answer any questions anyone might have about their project and they would appreciate this Committee’s recommendation to move this forward to full Council.  Mr. Fix moved to approve and forward to Council as a Final Development Plan and to schedule a Public Hearing for October 19, 2010, at 7:10 P.M.; Mr. Sauer seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sauer and Mr. Fix voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 2-0. 

 

                        (2)        Review and request for motion to approve draft ordinance to approve text amendments to Chapter 1278.02 of the Pickerington Codified Ordinances to allow single-family uses in the C-2 Central Business/Mixed Use Zoning District in the Olde Pickerington Village and to schedule a public hearing for Tuesday, October 19, 2010, at 7:20 P.M.  Ms Crotty stated this came about due to an inquiry earlier this year from a property owner in the old village who was interested in selling their property.  She stated the person interested in purchasing the property was interested in a commercial use as the primary use of the building but living above the business.  She stated we found that because most of the properties that are commercial along Columbus Street are zoned C-2, if they have not been used for a year as a single family residence or a portion has not been used as a single family residence, then that use is prohibited.  Ms Crotty stated it seemed like it would make sense in the historic district downtown that you would have buildings that would allow shop owners to live above the business or for property owners to rent the top floor as an additional source of income.  She stated our legal counsel reviewed our ordinance and the change would be to include just for the old downtown Pickerington village area, which will follow the boundaries that have been designated for the portable sign ordinance for the downtown, that single family uses shall be permitted uses when incorporated with a C-2 commercial use provided that it will not occupy more than 50 percent of the structure.  She stated this would ensure that the buildings do not revert back to residential use for the entire building.  Mr. Sauer stated he fully supported this amendment and Ms Crotty stated the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval as well.  Mr. Fix moved to approve and forward to Council and to set a Public Hearing for October 19, 2010, at 7:20 P.M.; Mr. Sauer seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sauer and Mr. Fix voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 2-0. 

 

             (3)       Refugee Road Study – Update.  Ms Crotty stated Mr. Schultz is working on getting the information together for a work session for the Planning and Zoning Commission and then presenting the draft plan to the Planning and Zoning Commission in November.  

 

6.         SERVICE DEPARTMENT

 

A.        Service Manager’s Report.  Mr. Drobina stated he had provided a written report and he would be happy to answer any questions.  Mr. Sauer stated he noticed the Tree Commission was recommending an amendment to our Code to increase the minimum caliper and questioned if there would be a cost with this.  Mr. Drobina stated there would be a cost; however, it would depend on the variety of the tree.  Mr. Drobina stated he agreed with the recommendation because it would provide a better chance for the tree to survive.  Mr. Drobina stated he did not have a draft ordinance prepared because he wanted to get the Committee’s feeling on this prior to doing that.  Mr. Sauer stated as he understood it this would be a better way to go just because of the health of the tree and we would not have to replace as many.  Mr. Drobina stated that was correct, and he would have a draft ordinance for the next Committee meeting. 

 

B.         WASTEWATER

 

            (1)        Wastewater Plant Expansion – Update.  Mr. Drobina stated the wastewater expansion is complete and it is up and operational.  He stated we do not have a final cost as far as the overage for engineering and inspection but he should have that in the next week or so.  Mr. Vance stated since we did have the contractor finishing after the deadline there were penalties associated with that.  He stated those have to be negotiated and then we will work with the engineers on the additional charges for their services.  He further stated once we have negotiated all of those details we will bring recommendations back to the Service Committee.  Mr. Fix clarified we are hoping that these balance out. 

 

                        a.         TDS – Update.  Mr. Bachman stated design of the water treatment to convert over to reverse-osmosis is proceeding and one thing he will be asking for is Council’s approval to go ahead with early procurement of reverse-osmosis equipment.  He stated that will move the project along a little faster and the benefit is that if we can show good progress to the EPA we are hoping they will give us a temporary waiver on the TDS limit so we can have less hardness coming out of our water treatment plant for our residents and less people will feel the need to put home water softeners in.  He stated if a lot of people put home water softeners in we still end up with a TDS problem at the wastewater treatment plant.  Mr. Bachman stated we should be ready with an early procurement contract in October and when we need the authorization to award that contract he would appreciate quick action, whether it be three readings with emergency, waiver of committee action, etc.  He stated we hope to have the reverse-osmosis in by the end of next year, if we can get early procurement we may be able to have it in before the bulk of the summer.  Mr. Fix stated if a Special Service Committee meeting is needed, he would be happy to accommodate that.  Mr. Bachman stated a committee waiver might be the easiest process and Mr. Sauer stated he is fine with that and he was sure Mr. Wisniewski would be as well.  Mr. Vance stated Mr. Bachman had scheduled a meeting with staff and our engineers and he has been involved in situations where the City would go ahead and order parts and materials first and the contractor would come in and then assume responsibility for those parts and materials with no objection.  He stated we want some sort of wording in the contract, and he had not heard any objection, that the contractor would not have a problem assuming responsibility for what we order so if there is a problem down the line they don’t claim it is the City’s problem.  He stated once they get the contract it becomes their equipment essentially.  Mr. Bachman stated he always has some concern about early procurement but in this case it seems to make sense and Mr. Vance stated he agreed it absolutely made sense. 

 

 

C.        WATER.  No report. 

 

7.         ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

 

A.        Engineer’s Report.  Mr. Bachman stated he had provided a written report and would be happy to answer any questions. 

 

Mr. Bachman stated with regard to storm water, we are having an erosion concern down in Shawnee Crossing with one of the streams off of Cherokee Court as the stream is eroding on the outside of the bank and we will have to address that next year.  He stated we should be able to address it with storm water utility funds, but encroaching is on City land, there is a reserve that came with the subdivision and that is where the bend of the stream is.  He stated it is getting awfully close to a property line so we will probably have to do something with that next year. 

 

Mr. Bachman stated we have also received a proposal from Tipping Point Renewable Energy to put in a solar panel array at the water plant that would basically provide about the same amount of electricity as the plant uses, and sell that electricity back to the power company to offset our electricity at the plant.  Mr. Bachman stated we use about $100,000 of electricity at that plant each year and the solar array would take up about five acres of land.  He stated we have about 60 acres of land at the water plant, and this would be one of, if not the largest, solar arrays in central Ohio.  He stated they would propose to put it in at their expense and basically charge us for power at a lower rate than what the power company charges us. Mr. Bachman stated from their projections the savings to the City the first year would be about $15,000 to $20,000 and graduate up to about $50,000 in year 20, so over a 20 year life it would be between $15,000 to $50,000 a year in savings to the City.  Mr. Bachman stated Mr. Vance and Mr. Drobina have looked at this as well and it looked very reasonable and good for the environment so we are strongly considering that.  He stated Tipping Point has asked for a letter of intent that does not bind us to anything but shows our intent.  Mr. Vance stated he felt this was a very exciting project and is a good opportunity for Pickerington to go green to some extent and there is a definite cost savings as far as electricity is concerned.  He stated this would cost the City nothing and he is familiar with various green opportunities in the past relating to such a possibility and while he has never been successfully involved with any such opportunity this is a private market proposal, he had encouraged them to come back with a realistic proposal.  Mr. Vance continued they did come back with what Mr. Bachman and Mr. Drobina consider to be a very realistic proposal and he recommends that we continue forward and indicate in a non-binding way that the City is extremely interested in pursuing this possibility with them.  Mr. Bachman stated he would add that right now solar is not competitive with conventional electricity, however, there is a significant federal government credit that is not available to public entities but is to private enterprises like Tipping Point and that is basically how they would end up making money, they would get the federal energy credit.  Mr. Fix clarified Tipping Point would front the cost of installing all the solar panels, they would then generate the electricity that would go into the plant, and they sell that electricity to us at their cost plus their mark-up.  Mr. Bachman stated it would come out to about 7-1/2 cents per kilowatt right now from the power company and their cost is about 6 cents per kilowatt hour.  Mr. Fix stated then their mark-up is designed to, over time, pay for the up front cost of the installation and questioned if at some point down the road was there a way we take ownership of that or see a reduction in the rate.  Mr. Vance stated those specifics would have to be negotiated, we do not have any type of base contract to look at right now and anything is possible in negotiations and those points can be brought up to provide the City some flexibility down the road.  Mr. Vance stated further these structures would not be absolutely permanent and they could be removed if the situation turned out not to be a good one for the City.  Mr. Sauer stated his question would be if there was an issue with the equipment, it would be Tipping Point’s expense to take care of it and that would be negotiated as well.  Mr. Vance stated absolutely, the goal is to make sure that the City has no expense other than in-kind expenses associated with the utilization of staff to negotiate the deal.  Mr. Vance stated he felt it would be a good start, if this Committee is supportive of us going in this direction, to send it on to full Council for their blessing prior to that letter going out.  Mr. Bachman stated he would also like to add that if the equipment did not work, we would go back to the electric grid.  Mr. Sauer stated his concern is that he did not want the equipment set up and then we assume responsibility for it.  Mr. Bachman stated it was his understanding they would have all the maintenance responsibility and we would make sure that was in the contract as well as a clause regarding removing the equipment if necessary.  Mr. Fix stated he thought it would be appropriate for Mr. Vance and Mr. Bachman to negotiate the contract and bring it back to Service Committee so it would then be moved forward to Council.  Mr. Bachman stated some preliminary engineering is involved so they want to make sure there is some Council buy-in before they do that, and Mr. Fix stated five members of Council were present this evening and they all were in favor of this.  Mr. Fix moved to authorize the City Manager and City Engineer to work with Tipping Point Renewable Energy on a letter of intent to establish a solar panel grid in Pickerington; Mr. Sauer seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sauer and Mr. Fix voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 2-0. 

 

B.         ACTION ITEMS:

 

            (1)        Water Master Plan and Sewer Master Plan - Update.  Mr. Bachman stated these projects should be wrapped up shortly and we will have a record of the location of those, the areas they serve, pressures, etc.   

 

                        a.         S.R. 256 Safety Improvement Project - Update.    Mr. Bachman stated he has met with ODOT’s new Safety Engineer for the District and they are very much interested in the project.  Mr. Bachman stated the Safety Engineer was checking to see what engineering the District could do for us on that application and he has not spoken to him to see what he has found as yet. 

 

            (2)        Review request for motion to approve two draft ordinances accepting water line easements for Refugee Road water tower.  Mr. Bachman stated these easements became necessary because the connection to our water line grid was not shown in the correct location on the plans and we actually found the water line to be on the other side of Windmiller Drive.  He stated we did get two easements at the cost of $1.00 from the commercial properties there and these ordinances will accept those easements.  Mr. Fix moved to approve the two draft ordinances and forward to Council; Mr. Sauer seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Fix and Mr. Sauer voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 2-0.  

 

C.        TRANSPORTATION

 

            (1)        Review and discussion regarding ODOT controlled traffic signals.  Mr. Bachman stated he has had correspondence with ODOT and they plan to put battery back-up on the two traffic signals at the end of the ramps for I-70 next year and they are initiating a traffic study for those signals.  He stated he does not have a timeframe set for that, but we have gotten their attention and they are looking at it to improve the timing through there. 

 

            (2)        School Speed Zone Study – Update.  No report. 

 

8.         CHAIRMAN.    Mr. Fix stated he had nothing to bring forward. 

 

9.         OTHER BUSINESS:  

 

A.        Mr. Vance stated he would like permission from the Committee to coordinate with the Growth Management personnel and Building Department personnel to coordinate a request for proposal in relation to contracting building inspection services to include code enforcement and a request for qualifications for professional planning consulting services.  He stated once we advertise for interested parties to participate the next step would be to bring proposed recommendations to Service Committee prior to negotiating contracts.  Mr. Fix stated as clarification Mr. Vance was asking for approval to go forward with the request for proposals and Mr. Vance stated that was correct.  Mr. Fix moved to authorize the City Manager to move forward with requests for proposals on these issues; Mr. Sauer seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Fix and Mr. Sauer voting “Yea.”  Motion passed, 2-0.  

 

10.       ADJOURNMENT.  There being nothing further, Mr. Sauer moved to adjourn; Mr. Fix seconded the motion.  Mr. Fix and Mr. Sauer voted “Aye.”  Motion carried, 2-0.  The Service Committee adjourned at 7:10 P.M., September 22, 2010.

 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:

 

 

________________________________

Lynda D. Yartin, Municipal Clerk