FINANCE COMMITTEE OF COUNCIL

CITY HALL, 100 LOCKVILLE ROAD

WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 6, 2010

 

REGULAR MEETING

7:30 P.M.

 

1.         ROLL CALL.  Mr. Wisniewski called the meeting to order at 7:42 P.M., with roll call as follows:  Mr. Blair, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Barletta, Mr. Fix, Mr. Sauer and Mr. Wisniewski were present.  Mrs. Sanders was absent.  Others present were Mayor O’Brien, Bill Vance, Chief Taylor, Lynda Yartin, Karen Risher, Chris Schornack, Stephanie Spencer, Linda Fersch, Ted Hackworth, Mary Beth Lane, Janet Thiede, Nate Ellis and Alexa Liebert.

 

2.         APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF September 8, 2010.  Mr. Fix moved to approve; Mr. Sauer seconded the motion.  Roll Call was taken with Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Fix, Mr. Blair, Mr. Barletta, Mr. Sauer, and Mr. Wisniewski voting “Yea”.  Motion passed, 6-0.

 

3.         FINANCE DEPARTMENT.

 

            A         Finance Director’s Report.  Mr. Schornack stated he had provided a written report and he would be happy to answer any questions. He stated we have received three new residential impact fee permits so far this month, we have received 57 residential permits through September which exceeds the 50 permits we projected for the entire year. The volume of permits for September was once again below 2009 levels for the same period.  Mr. Fix clarified that based on 50 houses annually this would bring in $80,000 to $100,000. Mr. Wisniewski stated that the City was rejected for our COPS grant and will not be getting an additional officer based off of a grant.

 

            B.         Review and request for motion to approve draft ordinance amending the 2010 appropriation, Ordinance 2009-91.  Mr. Schornack reviewed the appropriation request and stated he would answer any questions anyone might have.  Mr. Wisniewski clarified the total of $3.7 million at the end of the Transfers and Reimbursements line represents all transfers and reimbursements that come out of the general fund for all debt.  Mr. Wisniewski clarified that that the refund of sewer capacity fees for Huntwork Gardens is for sewer taps that were not used.   Mayor O’Brien clarified that on the Municipal Impact Fee Fund, the Municipal building loan will be paid off in one to two years.  Mr. Fix moved to approve and forward to Council;  Mr. Wisniewski seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sauer, Mr. Fix, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Barletta, Mr. Wisniewski and Mr. Blair voting “Yea”. Motion passed, 6-0. 

 

 Mr. Schornack stated he had two additional items to discuss this evening. First, he was requesting an advance because we did not receive enough revenues from our TIF monies to pay off the note.  He stated in the information he passed out tonight there is a copy of our delinquent TIF properties.  There are a couple hundred thousand dollars in delinquent payments in lieu of taxes for those properties within the TIF.  We have made Fairfield County aware that we are very concerned that we are not receiving any monies from those properties.  We hope to hear from them soon regarding moving further on foreclosing on the properties if necessary.  Mr. Wisniewski clarified that the Pickerington 204 property for $43,000.00 is part of the Cycle Way TIF.  Mrs. Fersch stated that is the Ashton property near the Holiday Inn. 

 

Mr. Wisniewski stated it appeared that One Pickerington Company LLC owes $62,000 and  Mr. Schornack started that is up to date now. In the Windmiller/Diley TIF the $139,008.88 is owed by the gym and he read that Huntington is foreclosing on that and hopefully once something happens on that we will receive proceeds from the delinquent property taxes on that.  This is how he anticipates paying back the $62,000.  Mr. Wisniewski clarified that we are the primary when it comes to the debt on that.  Mr. Fix stated that there is $308,000  out there and if Fairfield County doesn’t, or can’t, get anything to us our next step would be to send out prosecutor letters and work with our prosecutor on this.  Mr. Schornack stated we do not have TIF agreements in place so that is why we are mainly relying on Fairfield County. 

 

Mrs. Fersch explained that there is a service agreement that the landowner signs and states that if they would default the City is next in line to get the money.  We have the main TIF agreement, these are additional service agreements.  We have them for Marcus but for the other TIF’s they were in a hurry to get them done. With some of the TIF’s the landowner did not realize they were in the TIF area because by law the Manager could sign these.  That is what the Manager did and so they never pursued getting the service agreements.  Mr. Schornack stated therefore we have to rely on Fairfield County to collect these taxes.  Mr. Fix clarified that the County is going to take an aggressive stance on collecting these. Mr. Vance stated that these debts do have our attention. 

 

Mr. Schornack stated the second item is for repayment of the advance that was made to the Diley Road Fund.  There is a balance of $172,000. The project is for the most part completed and therefore this will repay the General Fund $172,000. He recommends forgiving the $58,000.00 owed to the General Fund by the Diley Road Widening Fund.  Mr. Fix clarified this would be forgiving the Diley Road Fund as we made a $230,000  advance back in 2008 to the Diley Road Fund.  The General Fund is obligated to pay for the principal and interest on the SIB loan therefore it is just as if we are paying principal and interest on the loan itself.  Mr. Fix moved to approve and move forward to council; Mr. Wisniewski seconded the motion.  Roll was taken with Mr. Sauer, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Blair, Mr. Fix and Mr. Barletta voting “Yea”.  Motion passed, 6-0.

 

4.         PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT.

 

            A.        Personnel Director’s Report. Mrs. Fersch stated she had provided a written report to the Finance Committee and would be happy to answer any questions.  She stated we have hired a Utilities Operator 1. His start date was October 4th. Mr. Wisniewski clarified this position is paid  out of the Water and Sewer Fund and is self- sustaining.  Mrs. Fersch stated Jerry Stiles is looking at coming back to work in mid October.  Mrs. Fersch further stated a full time Public Safety Dispatcher resigned and that position was filled by a part-time Dispatcher.  Interviews from the eligibility list were conducted today to fill the part-time Dispatcher position. Mrs. Fersch stated she received  74 applications for the Human Resources position and by the end of the week they should be ready for review with the City Manager.  There were several applicants from Pickerington as well as from various parts of the country.   She stated the Insurance Review Committee met and  McGowan-Brabender made a presentation on their Wellness Program. 

 

Mrs. Fersch stated that the conciliators report on the union negotiations is in and the contract will be signed in October. The training program on alcohol education has been completed. To save on costs she and Bill Yaple are discussing doing a joint training session with the Fire Department that will incorporate  sexual diversity, bullying and wellness.  This will suffice for training for the employees for this year.  She stated she had received our rates for C.O.R.M.A this year and it is $125,000, approximately $3,000.00 more than last year.

 

1.         Review and request for a motion to approve draft ordinance authorizing

the City Manager to enter into a one-year contract with Anthem Blue Cross/Blue Shield for health insurance for City employees and the declaration of necessity and emergency as the present policy expires on December 31, 2010.  Mrs. Fersch stated that Anthem came in early with their rate, usually it is just 60 days before.  They came in at 12.3% and after negotiation they agreed to 7.3% if we did not go out for other bids.  The industry market rate is 15%. The recommendation is to go with Anthem again.  She stated Anthem has done a good job and the employees are happy with them per a survey that was done.  She stated we want to sign the contract to get this locked in and she is requesting that it be done with three readings as an emergency.  There were no questions. Mr. Fix moved to approve and forward to Council; Mr. Wisniewski seconded the motion. Roll call was taken with Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Fix, Mr. Barletta, Mr. Blair, Mr. Wisniewski, and Mr. Sauer voting “Yea”.  Motion passed, 6-0.

 

                        2.         Review and request for a motion to approve draft ordinance authorizing the City Manager to enter into a one-year contract with Delta Dental of Ohio for dental insurance for City employees.  Mrs. Fersch stated that Delta Dental will not give a rate until 60 days before so we do not have that.  The legislation is with that blank and will be filled in when it is received.  Mr. Fix clarified that not giving a rate until 60 days before is standard.  Mayor O’Brien clarified that the broker had been advised that if they can come in at the same rate the City will not shop around.  Mrs. Fersch stated they haven’t gotten back with us yet and it could change.  Mayor O’Brien clarified that this would be the first reading to get the process started.  Mrs. Hammond clarified the City is required to provide dental insurance per the union contracts. Mrs. Fersch stated that if we stay with Delta the employees will not have to change dentists.  Mr. Fix stated he felt this could be continued to the next  Finance meeting as he is not comfortable with moving forward on this without knowing for certain that it will be Delta.  Mr. Wisniewski stated that we have done this with other contracts.  Mr. Vance stated his concern is that in those contracts we understood who the provider would be and we had a final amount not to exceed and with this one being so up in the air we don’t know if it will be Delta Dental or someone else.  It could end up being moved forward to council and then find out we have to go out for bid on it.  Mr. Wisniewski moved to approve and forward to Council; Mr. Sauer seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sauer, Mr. Blair, Mr. Barletta and Mr. Wisniewski voting “Yea” and Mrs. Hammond and Mr. Fix voting “Nay”.  Motion passed, 4-2.  

 

5.         CHAIRMAN:   Mr. Wisniewski stated he had nothing to bring forward.

 

OTHER BUSINESS:

 

            A.        Review and discussion regarding Ordinance 2010-19, an ordinance approving the rezoning and final development plan for the approximate 16.06 acre Ebright/Homestead parcels. 

Mr. Vance stated there has been discussion and there are still issues to be resolved. He stated we are not ready to move forward at this point.  Mrs. Hammond clarified that this issue was moved back to Finance as there is a potential TIF issue related to this.  Mayor O’Brien stated this will have to go back to Council for final action as it is on its third reading at Council. Mr. Vance stated there has been some activity on this.  Mayor O’Brien clarified that at this point this has been the most activity since Mr. Vance became City Manager.  Mrs. Hammond clarified that this had been removed from council on the third reading and referred to Finance, Finance has continued it, when Finance determines what they are going to do it will then be returned to Council. Mr. Wisniewski stated this would remain on the agenda at this time.

 

            B.         Review and request for a motion to approve draft ordinance authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract with Franklin County Board of Health for 2011. Mr. Wisniewski clarified that this is for our annual contract for 2011.  Mrs. Yartin stated that this was reviewed by the Law Director. Mr. Vance recommended we proceed with this.  Mr. Wisniewski moved to approve and forward to Council; Mr. Sauer seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mr. Sauer, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Blair, Mr. Fix and Mr. Barletta voting “Yea”.  Motion passed, 6-0.

 

            C.        Review and request for a motion to approve draft ordinance to place an income  tax issue before the electors at the General Election on May 3, 2011.  Mr. Vance stated that the Budget proposal contains a lot of needs that are not addressed.  To maintain the police department we need additional officers.  This is not as much due to the population or crime rate, it is due to the amount of traffic that continues to increase throughout  the City.  There are street maintenance needs that are not being met and there is significant debt obligation that needs to be met as well.  We will need additional revenue to maintain our current quality of life.  Mr. Wisniewski clarified that the one percent was here in 1976, and the one percent can only increase with voter approval and the City can eliminate the credit without voter approval.  Mrs. Fersch stated in 1976 there were a lot of financial problems and they needed revenue.  Mr. Wisniewski stated that at the retreat the number one issue council agreed upon is the need for additional sources of revenue.  Mr. Wisniewski clarified that the current proposal has the increase going into effect on January 1, 2012,  however that can be amended.  If this were approved we would not receive all of that revenue until the following year. 

 

Mr. Sauer clarified the effective date could be amended.   Mr. Sauer stated that on the unfunded budget list one item is street paving.  The City Engineer has told us that our streets need to be addressed.  The areas being addressed now are just the tip of the iceberg, we aren’t doing enough to keep up with the Engineer’s suggestion of the 10 percent per year we should be doing annually in order to maintain the streets so we don’t have to rebuild them. The cost to rebuild is obviously higher than the cost of maintaining them.  The $370,000 in the unfunded budget list is not enough to cover that 10 percent suggestion of the City Engineer.  In our Budget Work Session we heard that the Police Department is running with a skeleton crew. If the officers are tied up in one part of the City and something else crops up in another area we have a delayed response.  This is not a situation I want to find my family in and I think if most people truly understood that, they would not want to find themselves in that situation either.  This is $160,000 for two officers in the unfunded budget. The para transit subsidy is $10,000, this is partnered with Violet Township to provide transportation service to our residents.  The residents who use that are not only those who are handicapped, it is used by senior citizens to get back and forth to doctor appointments, pick up prescriptions, etc.  It provides students with safe transports back and forth to school for practices. The  Refugee and Hill Roads  intersection is one that can’t handle the traffic it has now per the Ohio Department of Transportation.  We had a grant available to us a few years ago and the City did not have the funding to match the grant to improve the intersection, nor could we if one were available now.  Sidewalks have been discussed for years.  Columbus Street and Long Road desperately need sidewalks. Mr. Sauer stated he does not see anywhere else we can cut to be able to fund these projects or to maintain the quality of life here without going to an increase in the income tax in one way or another.

 

Mr. Wisniewski stated these are the big items, but there are smaller ones too; The Carnegie Building is falling apart.  We cut things out of the budget years ago, like spraying for weeds that have cropped up in subdivisions along the streets.  The expense subcommittee met for a long time and went over every budget.  Mr. Sauer stated he was on that committee and we came out of there with ideas, some were implemented, others weren’t.  It was primarily that some of the ones that weren’t are quality of life issues.  Some of those decisions are going to have to change if this continues. 

 

Mr. Wisniewski stated that we dipped into our rainy day fund for $800,000 last year. We worked on some of worst streets this year, there is no way we can find $370,000 in this budget to pave streets next year, and that’s a drop in the bucket compared to what we should do.  He knows there is some concern on Council on how to proceed.  We need to make a decision and go forward or make the appropriate cuts, we can’t keep going back and forth with our staff and residents as to what we are or are not going to do.  The option before us tonight is to increase the income tax to two percent and that is very in line with other municipalities around central Ohio. It gives a credit back that most other municipalities give back to their residents also.  It will impact our residents that live and work here, or that work elsewhere and do not pay an income tax elsewhere. The reality is the City is in desperate need of funding.  The police levy brings in $1.4 million and their expenditure is $4.3 million.  Only 25 percent of our police budget is coming from property tax and 75 percent is coming from our General Fund. This is our biggest expenditure and at times that is woefully understaffed at times.  During the past 3 months only 1/3 of the shifts were fully staffed.  That is a good indicator of where our needs are.

 

Mayor O’Brien stated he appreciates that we have a balanced budget before us. The last page is the key factor and that is the unfunded requests at $2,000,000.  This is broken down by departments as to what they need that we can’t provide, in addition to the General Fund. The Carnegie Building was mentioned and if we can’t fund it in 2011 and aren’t going to run a tax issue and we aren’t going to fund it in 2012 then we need to put it up for adoption and see if someone is willing to take over management and operations of the building.  We can’t let it fall apart without offering someone the ability to pick it up.  We no longer have the money to match grant funds.  Mayor O’Brien feels we should say no to using any of the $2,000,000 carry over and leave this money in the General Fund for the things that we don’t yet know we will be facing in 2011.  Looking forward to 2012, we don’t have money for any opportunities for economic development such as being able to buy a piece of land that could be used as an incentive.  We can’t invest in economic development.  The Police levy was mentioned.  We all recently received our property valuations and they went down.  We will collect less off the Police levy because property taxes will fall.  Mayor O’Brien stated he is only asking that we give the residents the opportunity to decide if they want to invest in their community further than they already are.  If they choose to invest in the quality of life and a safe environment then we will all be better off for it.

 

Mr. Wisniewski clarified that the City’s General Fund received approximately $900,000 from property taxes in 2010. 

 

Mr. Fix stated on the current budget proposal there is a carry over of $2,000,000  almost a 30 percent carry over.  We have to make the choice of funding some of these things out of the 30 percent carry over amount.  He feels it would be great if we can continue to afford to do this however he doesn’t know if we can afford to have that carry over and still go to the voters and ask them for more.  This is an alternative that we need to discuss further.  Mr. Fix stated he agrees that in the very near future we are going to have to come up with some source of sustainable income.  He stated 9 out of 10 people are telling him the City does not need a tax increase. Mr. Fix stated he knows that we do need it, however we have not communicated that to the public; we have not shown them we are doing without because we continue to pave the streets and the police are everywhere.  It seems like there are five officers on the street when there are really only two.  He spoke with someone last night that stated the City does not need more police, they are everywhere.  This is the perception that is out there. We need to do a better job of communicating the seriousness of this issue to the public, and that we are looking at every way we can think of to reduce expenditures.  There is a high likelihood that if we are on the May 2011 ballot we will be going up against a school issue and he thinks that would mean a guaranteed failure.  We have to do everything we can to make sure that when we provide the voters with the opportunity to invest in the community that they have enough information to make a choice that will benefit the entire community in the long run.  City managers past and present,  our Finance Department, staff and Council have done an incredibly good job of making do with less.  Mr. Fix stated he feels it would not be a wise decision to put this on the May ballot.

 

Mr. Sauer stated that Mr. Fix made some good points.  He disagrees with the carry over because he thinks that next year it will be a lot less.  Out of the carry over, can we fund two officers, pave the streets that need paving, build the sidewalks we need and continue to pay down debt. He feels that in 2011 we will be paying our debt down in a lesser amount than we did this year.  The voters may not be there yet however we need to come together as a City and fund these things so that we can continue to be the community that we are.

 

Mayor O’Brien clarified that it is an option that we have discussion on eliminating the credit and that the City currently credits our taxpayers approximately $1.5 million per year. That is certainly a discussion we can have. That amount would cover most of the shortfall.  Another option for discussion is annexations. These are two sustainable sources of income.  Mr. Fix stated this is a good point.  There are other options and we should meet again to discuss the other alternatives that are out there before we put another income tax levy on the ballot. 

 

Mr. Wisniewski stated that he feels the last thing we need is to rehash everything that we have been doing for the last several years.  If we are not going to put this on the May ballot, when are we going to?  Mr. Sauer stated that regarding the alternative of annexation, that requires outside action coming to us to make that happen.  Eliminating the credit gives the voters no option of voting on it, the income tax levy does.  Mayor O’Brien stated that Baltimore eliminated their tax credit and that was a gutsy call. Mr. Sauer stated we need to present our case to the voters by stating what we need and showing what we have.   Mr. Barletta stated his concerns are that the economy is bad and voters see us spending money and looking financially healthy.  He has followed this issue and read the minutes from the expense subcommittee prior to his being elected and he feels Council made every effort to look at the budget carefully. Safety is a concern for him, he is concerned that there is a lot of narcotic use in the community.  We are barely hanging on and in some areas are going backwards.  He thinks we need to ask the voters.

 

Mr. Blair stated if this is not on the May ballot, it can be revisited for the November, 2011 ballot with a date it will be effective. Mr. Blair stated he wants to get through the budget first. There were ideas mentioned tonight and he wants to make sure that we do our due diligence going through the budget process, have the City Manager reach out to the Sheriff’s Department on items mentioned in the budget work session and determine if we can see cost savings in those areas.  In the past going with R.I.T.A was discussed and that didn’t come up to a huge cost savings.  Mr. Wisniewski stated with R.I.T.A there was the customer service difference and we were not saving any money in the budget as a whole because we were taking employees from that department and moving them somewhere else.  

 

Mrs. Hammond stated she is not opposed to putting something on the ballot and with the credit left as it is she would be more inclined to vote for it.  Mr. Barletta stated he is more inclined to leave the credit as it is now. Mr. Fix stated he does not doubt there is a need.  The difference between two months ago and today is the number of people he has talked to about that have made it clear that they do not think we need it yet.  He knows we need to have a carry over but he feels 30 percent is way too much in the carry over when we are asking for a tax increase.

 

Mayor O’ Brien stated we need to communicate the message concurrently with this issue.  We are looking at a balanced budget for 2011 and for 2012 it looks grim.  If we wait until November, 2011 and it fails we soon are in 2012.  Outsourcing a good portion of our police department is not acceptable to him, unless the service goes up and the costs go down.  He thinks 2012 is too late.

 

Mr. Ted Hackworth stated that the arboretum in Sycamore Park was a nice spot with stakes to identify the items. Now most of it has been destroyed and it’s full of weeds.  You are down to only two maintenance employees. The other day they were hanging over the side of the bridge where the slats had been kicked out.  He stated there are drugs being used in the parks.  They will not be caught unless there are security cameras there.  You leave the park depressed.  This is how the City is becoming.  In Cherry Hill there are fish scales forming in the street.  In the past,

Courtright Drive started out with fish scale cracks and two years later after one bad winter there was mud pushing up through the street.  They had to dig the whole thing out for  about 100 yards of it and put in a new base.  He does not think $1.3 million will be enough.  Services have been cut for the past five years.  We need sidewalks on Columbus Street and on Hill Road.  The City is deteriorating.  Regarding the school levy, everyone he has talked to has said it will fail this year. The school board puts a levy on as the start of the learning process.  It takes three of four attempts to get it passed.  Council tried one time and walked away.  The City is going to be a slum and he doesn’t think the Chief will have enough officers to handle it.  You need to get a good campaign. The concentration is too heavy on what the voters think or the fairness of the vote.  You need to be talking about the needs of the City.  There are a lot of misconceptions out there and you need to be specific on what services will be cut.

 

Mayor O’Brien stated if we continue this for a month we can look at different tax and credit options and discuss the options.  He clarified that this can be continued on the agenda.  Mrs. Hammond stated this is the only place she has lived where a City would put in sidewalks and pay 100 percent of the cost.  They usually expect the property owner  to pay a portion or all of the cost.  She stated there are other ways to do some of these things and if it comes down to that we may be forced to.  It is a hard decision to make but is something we may have to do.

 

 Mr. Sauer clarified that Mrs. Hammond is speaking about new sidewalks.  He doesn’t know how the City can decide to do an improvement to their property and the property owner is going to pay for it.  Mrs. Hammond stated this is what most places do. Mayor O’ Brien stated that we can do that. Mr. Sauer clarified that Mrs. Hammond was not saying that the City would ask people to increase their taxes and then ask them to also pay for a sidewalk,  she was pointing out that there are other ways to do things.  Mr. Sauer stated that he has asked the Law Director to include information on renewing the police levy in next month’s packets.

 

Mr. Wisniewski stated this would be continued on the agenda.

 

            D.        Review and discussion regarding proposed Organizational Chart.

 

Mr. Vance stated there have been general discussions on the direction of the organizational chart and there appears to be a need for Council to adopt an organizational chart at some point in time. This is anticipated to take place at the conclusion of the budget process.  He has put together a draft for the Finance Committee.  Mr. Wisniewski stated he thinks it is news to Council that the Planning and Zoning Director reports to council, he does not think anyone was under the impression this is the case.  In his assessment of it is he has no understanding why that position reports to Council or why it should.  Mr. Fix clarified this is not per the Charter. Mayor O’Brien stated he thinks it also conflicts with the Human Resources manual.  Mr. Wisniewski made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Director is appointed by the City Manager and leave out with the concurrence of Council; Mr. Blair seconded the motion.  Roll call was taken with Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Sauer, Mr. Blair, Mr. Barletta, Mr. Fix and Mr. Wisniewski voting “Yea”.  Motion passed, 6-0.

 

Mayor O’Brien clarified that it is not in the Charter that we are required to have a Planning and Zoning Director and that there are no certifications required by the City to be titled Planning and Zoning Director and that the City Manager could designate the Development Director to serve as the Planning and Zoning Director for the City if needed.  Mayor O’Brien clarified that as it stands now, under that position would be the Chief Building Official,  Code Enforcement, Senior Planner and Planner.

 

Mr. Vance stated that with the other employees appointed by Council, their employees answer to them directly. Mr. Wisniewski clarified that the Finance Director would include Utility Billing and Income Tax collections, the City Engineer would include the Staff Engineer and Construction Inspectors. Mr. Wisniewski clarified that the City Manager is still technically responsible for the employees at this point in time. They get their direction from the Finance Director and the City Engineer.  Mr. Wisniewski clarified that if there were personnel issues for someone under the Finance Director that this is where the City Manager’s involvement would take place, it is so there is  no confusion as to the chain of command.  Mayor O’Brien clarified that in the proposed Charter the City Engineer is appointed by Council but the daily management of their employees is delegated to the City Manager and that the City Manager would do the annual reviews of the Council appointees, and the Mayor will do the City Manager’s annual review, and that Council can provide input to the City Manager when he is doing the reviews.  This is part of the charter review that is on the November ballot.

 

Mrs. Yartin clarified that the amendment to the code regarding the Planning and Zoning Director

will come to the next Service Committee.  Mr. Wisniewski clarified Mrs. Yartin will check with the Law Director to find out if we have to title that position as Planning and Zoning Director or if it can be named something else.  Mr. Vance stated that the current make up of that department at this point in time is comfortable with Development Services and the  City Manger would appoint the Development Services Director to act in that capacity when necessary.

 

            E.         Review and discussion regarding TIF’s.

 

Mr. Schornack stated that he would be asking our Bond Counsel, Dennis Schwallie, to come in and speak regarding our outstanding TIF issues and some possible options as some of these will be expiring in 2012.

 

 Mr. Wisniewski clarified that the 10 mill limitation information is per Mr. Sauer’s request and is one of the options for the replacement of the 10 mill levy. This will be on next month’s agenda. 

 

7.         MOTIONS:

 

            A.        Motion for Executive Session under Section 121.22(G)(1)b, Matters involving an employee’s or public official’s employment, Section 121.22(G)(2), Purchase or sale of public property, Section 121.22(G)(3), Conference with law director regarding pending or imminent court action, and Section 121.22(G)(4), Matters involving bargaining sessions with public employees.  Mr. Wisniewski stated that the Executive Session was not needed.

 

9.         ADJOURNMENT.  There being nothing further, Mr. Wisniewski moved to adjourn; Mr. Blair seconded the motion.  Mr. Barletta, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Fix, Mrs. Hammond, Mr. Sauer and Mr. Blair voted “Aye”.  Motion carried, 6-0.  The Finance Committee adjourned at 9:18 P.M., October 6, 2010.

 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:                    ATTEST:

 

 

______________________________            _________________________________

Karen I. Risher, Administrative Clerk    Lynda D. Yartin, Municipal Clerk